The Tea Party Patriots' mission is to restore America's founding principles of Fiscal Responsibility, Constitutionally Limited Government and Free Markets.
This is a video of a thoroughly Brain Dead or Brain Washed top police official. It is reminiscent of the tenor of all the Dictatorial Gun confiscations by Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and others just before they decided to confiscate every legally owned gun so they would not be at risk when they enslaved or led their people to slaughter!
California Police Chief Ken James insisted earlier this month that the idea of a gun as a “defensive weapon” was a “myth.” Speaking at a news conference about gun control with California lawmakers, James explained that he was concerned with the amount of weapons owned by American citizens.
“One issue that always boggles my mind is that the idea that a gun is a defensive weapon,” James said. “That is a myth. A gun is not a defensive weapon.”
James is the Police Chief of Emeryville, California and the Police Chief Association’s Firearms Committee Chairman. “A gun is an offensive weapon used to intimidate and show power,” he asserted, explaining to the audience that police officers don’t carry weapons to defend themselves, but to do their job in a “safe and effective manner.”
JAMES’ STATEMENT HAS BECOME A SUBJECT OF RIDICULE AMONG GUN OWNERS ONLINE.
261 comments of this article
===> Here’s are (the first) few of them.
David ==> Now, I understand why California cops run and hide from gang-bangers with uzi’s. Their guns are no good for defense.
Frank St Clair ==> So his cops are displaying deadly force offensively to display power? Interesting.
LeRoyDaniels ==> Yeah, sort of like the Nazi SS.
Lance Holiday ==> or King George’s goons, no difference.
Lifelonghuman ==> First thing that came to my mind. That’s why cops shoot first.
Esau’s Message ==> Revealing.
Joedakota ==> What a bunch of crap. If guns are not defensive weapons why do police carry a gun. Point a gun at an armed policeman and see how quickly his weapon becomes defensive. Why is no one even mentioning the thousands of urban gang members that Roam LA when gun control is brought up, or the drug gangs roaming California.
Judging by the two women that endured a panic attack of one hundred shots fired by law officers, maybe some police shouldn’t even have guns. Except for my hunting rifles the guns I have are for two purpose’s target shooting and the defense of my self and family.
It really scary when police like Ken James make anti gun statements and are armed but don’t want law a biding citizens to be armed and have the God given right of self defense.
Don’t forget a few years ago when the armored robbers hit the bank, not one California cop tried for a head shot in the face when the robbers were only wearing ski masks. How many cops got shot before the lucky shot hit the one robber in the foot?
active 58 minutes ago
This is a video of a thoroughly Brain Dead or Brain Washed top police official. It is reminiscent of the tenor of all the Dictatorial Gun confiscations by Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and others just before they decided to confiscate every legally owned gun so they would not be at risk when they enslaved or led their people to slaughter!
Can you say: ”LOOSER” ?
Can you say Paranoid Schizophrenic Brain washed liar with a God complex? At least that’s how he strikes me but what do I know?
I believe I’ve found out why the LA cop went nutso—
I agree, the Police Chief/Superintendent is nutzo!!!
California Police Chief Ken James insisted earlier this month that the idea of a gun as a “defensive weapon” was a “myth.” Speaking at a news conference about gun control with California lawmakers, James explained that he was concerned with the amount of weapons owned by American citizens.
“One issue that always boggles my mind is that the idea that a gun is a defensive weapon,” James said. “That is a myth. A gun is not a defensive weapon.”
James is the Police Chief of Emeryville, California and the Police Chief Association’s Firearms Committee Chairman. “A gun is an offensive weapon used to intimidate and show power,” he asserted, explaining to the audience that police officers don’t carry weapons to defend themselves, but to do their job in a “safe and effective manner.”
JAMES’ STATEMENT HAS BECOME A SUBJECT OF RIDICULE AMONG GUN OWNERS ONLINE.
261 comments of this article
===> Here’s are (the first) few of them.
David ==> Now, I understand why California cops run and hide from gang-bangers with uzi’s. Their guns are no good for defense.
Frank St Clair ==> So his cops are displaying deadly force offensively to display power? Interesting.
LeRoyDaniels ==> Yeah, sort of like the Nazi SS.
Lance Holiday ==> or King George’s goons, no difference.
Lifelonghuman ==> First thing that came to my mind. That’s why cops shoot first.
Esau’s Message ==> Revealing.
Joedakota ==> What a bunch of crap. If guns are not defensive weapons why do police carry a gun. Point a gun at an armed policeman and see how quickly his weapon becomes defensive. Why is no one even mentioning the thousands of urban gang members that Roam LA when gun control is brought up, or the drug gangs roaming California.
Judging by the two women that endured a panic attack of one hundred shots fired by law officers, maybe some police shouldn’t even have guns. Except for my hunting rifles the guns I have are for two purpose’s target shooting and the defense of my self and family.
It really scary when police like Ken James make anti gun statements and are armed but don’t want law a biding citizens to be armed and have the God given right of self defense.
Don’t forget a few years ago when the armored robbers hit the bank, not one California cop tried for a head shot in the face when the robbers were only wearing ski masks. How many cops got shot before the lucky shot hit the one robber in the foot?