active 2 months, 3 weeks ago
-
John Hosie posted an update in the group Nevada 11 months, 2 weeks ago
I received an email today from townhall.com suggesting that since Scott Walker survived his ordeal in Wisconson, perhaps it is time to recall Harry Reid. I know what they were looking for was a donation to one of the funds they support. They’re hoping to get a GoP majority in the Senate to boot Harry out of the Majority Leader slot. But I figured it wouldn’t hurt to try to REALLY recall him.It all boils down to whether you can get enough people to sign a petition.
I did a little research into the recall procedure in Nevada. The Nevada constitution says:
Sec. 9. Recall of public officers: Procedure and limitations. Every public officer in the State of Nevada is subject, as herein provided, to recall from office by the registered voters of the state, or of the county, district, or municipality which he represents. For this purpose, not less than twenty-five percent (25%) of the number who actually voted in the state or in the county, district, or municipality which he represents, at the election in which he was elected, shall file their petition, in the manner herein provided, demanding his recall by the people. They shall set forth in said petition, in not exceeding two hundred (200) words, the reasons why said recall is demanded. If he shall offer his resignation, it shall be accepted and take effect on the day it is offered, and the vacancy thereby caused shall be filled in the manner provided by law. If he shall not resign within five (5) days after the petition is filed, a special election shall be ordered to be held within thirty (30) days after the issuance of the call therefor, in the state, or county, district, or municipality electing said officer, to determine whether the people will recall said officer. On the ballot at said election shall be printed verbatim as set forth in the recall petition, the reasons for demanding the recall of said officer, and in not more than two hundred (200) words, the officer’s justification of his course in office. He shall continue to perform the duties of his office until the result of said election shall be finally declared. Other candidates for the office may be nominated to be voted for at said special election. The candidate who shall receive highest number of votes at said special election shall be deemed elected for the remainder of the term, whether it be the person against whom the recall petition was filed, or another. The recall petition shall be filed with the officer with whom the petition for nomination to such office shall be filed, and the same officer shall order the special election when it is required. No such petition shall be circulated or filed against any officer until he has actually held his office six (6) months, save and except that it may be filed against a senator or assemblyman in the legislature at any time after ten (10) days from the beginning of the first session after his election. After one such petition and special election, no further recall petition shall be filed against the same officer during the term for which he was elected, unless such further petitioners shall pay into the public treasury from which the expenses of said special election have been paid, the whole amount paid out of said public treasury as expenses for the preceding special election. Such additional legislation as may aid the operation of this section shall be provided by law.
So, do you think a recall of Harry Reid is possible? It seems to be a tall order to get so many signers, but it seems that it would be an ideal solution – so no matter who wins Senate seats in November, the nation can rest in the comfort of the knowledge that Harry Reid was recalled.
Harry Reid should be placed under arrest, but so Should Eric holder and we see how that’s going.
At this point in time, there is probably not sufficient evidence to hold Harry for anything. I’d love to see him locked up, but we don’t want to become as bad as they are by ignoring the rules of evidence. At a minimum, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi are guilty of conspiracy to commit treason. But that is only, at this point, a matter of what I believe. I have yet to see evidence or hear testimony.
It is obvious that Barak Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and a host of other Democrats were all involved. If the reports of a new UN treaty to control guns are true, then chances are Hillary Clinton is, too. And then there is the Law of the Sea Treaty. (LOST). It is also alleged to give away our rights to massive amounts of minerals in the ocean, and allow the UN to collect a tax to redistribute wealth obtained by offshore mining. And there is also the treaty with Russia to decide the our westernmost boundary. It has been negotiated for decades. It gives away islands from the sovereign State of Alaska. That negotiation, I understand, started with Kissinger, and spanned the Carter, Reagan, Bush Sr, Clinton, Bush Jr, and Obama administrations.
So there is a helluvalot going on.
There is also the negotiation between Obama, Mexico and Canada to create a North American Union.
These things are all despicable. All of them are being done to destroy American soverigntyand to distribute American resources to the rest of the world. All of them are being done to destroy the Constitution of the United States, and to make use of far more liberal populations of the world to overcome American conservative values. But the evidence… That is the problem.