OurMission
The Tea Party Patriots' mission is to restore America's founding principles of Fiscal Responsibility, Constitutionally Limited Government and Free Markets.
View Our Mission
Profile picture of Glenn Eades active 1 week, 1 day ago
  • Glenn Eades posted an update in the group West Virginia 5 months, 1 week ago

    Petition your state senators to advise Electors not to submit their vote…!!!

    If anyone missed this and has not yet signed the petition, please read the following and do so now…
    and be sure to forward this to everyone you know… we still have over a week to make enough noise to be heard and make this happen…! Depending on what you do right now, ”Bozo” may NOT get to ”stay” in OUR White House…!

    as you know, a president is NOT elected by popular vote; he/she is elected by the Electoral College…
    and the College will NOT meet until Dec. 17th, this year. IF just 17 states ”withhold” their Electoral College vote, it then falls to the HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES (not the senate) to ”select” the next president!!

    This petition basically, tells your state Senators to advise their state’s electors NOT to submit their vote!

    We need to DROWN Congress with hundreds of thousands of these fax/petitions – -make OUR voices SO LOUD, we cannot be ignored! So, go there and do it NOW

    Sign the petition at – http://tinyurl.com/b6jg72x

    • Glenn Eades

      But we’re not talkng ”in the event of a tie”, Jerry.
      and I have written directly to the office of the Federal Register to confirm this information.

      The Vetting Process for President and Vice President

      The process established for the selection of a president and vice president provides three vetting opportunities. The first occurs immediately following the nominating conventions when the parties certify their candidates to the state election boards so that ballots can be printed.

      The second vetting opportunity occurs on the Monday after the second Wednesday in December when the Electoral College meets to elect a president and vice president. Between November 4, 2008, the date of the General Election, and December 15, 2008, the date on which the Electoral College met to cast their votes, most Democratic electors were made aware of serious questions relating to Obama’s eligibility. None of the Democratic electors raised a serious question about Obama’s eligibility prior to casting their electoral ballots… a violation of their oath of office and a complete and total subversion of the very purpose of the Electoral College.

      The third and final vetting opportunity occurs in early January following each election when the Congress meets in joint session to certify the votes of the Electoral College. As the final fail-safe step in the electoral process, the members of Congress have the duty to insure themselves of the qualifications of the candidates selected by the Electoral College. http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/42350

      So, please stop saying it won’t work.
      It is the way the system was designed to work.

      There was also the fellow who insisted Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan provide their birth certificates which made quite a few headlines not so long ago. That individual was a member of the Electoral College, and his reason for doing so was explained as being a duty of the members of the Electoral to ensure candidates are eligible for office, to require such information, and to withhold their vote should such proof not be provided.

      Read up and become informed – http://preview.tinyurl.com/bounhb9

      In the case of the Electoral College not supplying the required number of votes, it then falls to Congress and the Senate to take the action required to make the determination of eligibility and to determine the vote or confirm the ineligibility.

      Nor was I the one who first came up with the idea or created the petitions which exist for individuals to request their representatives to act appropriately upon this ineligibility issue even at this late date.

      So, I will thank you to stop with the personal insults as well.

      5 months, 1 week ago
    • Glenn Eades

      Apparently you can’t read, so I’ll repeat what has already been said –
      1) stop insulting people at every chance you get.
      2) It is NOT my petition, so please stop saying it is.
      3) I was provided information; I did google searches; as well as wrote directly to the electoral college website at the federal archives. Based on the information I was provided, the information I posted was accurate and worthy of acting upon.
      4) My intent was to assist others, regardless of your imagination or opinion.
      5) Asking people to take action is NOT what is killing the Tea Party. Faulting others who are trying to help others, who’s heart is in the right place, who show a willingness to take action and attacking them, insulting them, and behaving in a belligerent manner is whats actually killing the Tea Party. It’s the infighting and the discouragement that has been going on ever since the primaries with everyone arguing and fighting about how bad every other candidate is, and beating everyone up who comes across their path.

      I have seen more than one site fail over the course of the past couple of years due to individuals like yourself making personal attacks upon fellow members. Most often I am thanked for my efforts, as at least my heart is in the right place. I have personally organized and run a Tea Party organization from scratch, and am a member of several Tea Party groups a couple of which I have personally saved by standing up to such arrogance and belligerence against their members by individuals such as your have shown yourself to possess.

      If my information is incorrect, so be it. That still does not warrant being beat up on, called names, insulted, and put down by someone who claims to support the Tea Party movement and what it represents.

      I’m open to new information; open to the possibility of having been misinformed; and open to discussion with anyone who would like to have a civil discussion with leads to either or both of our betterment. I am not open to being called names, insulted, told my ideas are useless, and other such demeaning behavior by someome who shows nothing but negativity and hostility at every chance he gets.

      I am also not open to being attributed with coming up with the ideas or information in the articles I have read (and have provided links for yours and others reference, which apparently you never took the time to actually read); nor am I open to being told I’m a Leftist for trying to help other likeminded people find effectve action to take, or falsely accused of having written petitions or what-have-you that I simply pointed people in the direction of and had nothing to do with the writing of.

      Does that perhaps give you some small glimmer if insight into why someone who is as devoted and Patriotic as myself has attempted to share the information I have with others? Is the lightbulb starting to come on?

      Or are you still intent on being willfully ignorant of any possible posiive intent behind my posts and to harrass me at every opportunity and in as unPatriotic a manner, as only by those on the far Left might be expected to behave?

      No one who believes in the same cause as another would ever expect to see such anger, belligerence, harrasment, or personal insults and attack as you have consistently demonstrated since your first post here. You do not show yourself to be gentleman or a fellow patriot in any way, nor do I care to associate with anyone who is so uncivil or so lacking in understanding, insight, or compassion for their fellow man, but I will certainly do what I can to further the cause of Constitutional conservatism, the opposition to the Marxist onslaught we have been witnessing these past 4 years, and the restoration to whatever degree is possible of the Rights, Liberties, and Freedoms our Forefathers fought and died to give us, and to encourage others to do the same, regardless of individuals like you who discourage, harrass, divide and conquer from within, and see no reason to be supportive of those who are willing to do what they believe is right, nor share with them in a civil manner that they might benefit from what you might know that they may yet lack in understanding of, if this indeed be the case.

      5 months, 1 week ago