Local Tea Partier explains why amnesty is flawed


Across the country, Tea Party activists are communicating with their neighbors, friends, and family. John Morningstar of the Bradford County Tea Party in Pennsylvania reached out to his community with a letter to the editor explaining exactly why the Senate’s immigration bill is flawed.

With John’s permission, we have reprinted his letter below:

Bill is flawed

EDITOR: On June 27, the Senate approved a very flawed, massive amnesty bill. It is commonly referred to as “comprehensive immigration reform,” but the only thing comprehensive about the bill is its failure to address border security. The House of Representatives will now take up immigration reform, and it is up to us, the electorate, to let our representatives know how much we disapprove of the Senate amnesty bill. The Senate’s attempt, spearheaded by Senators Chuck Schumer and Marco Rubio, is so flawed, in fact, that it simply cannot be fixed. Some of the bill’s most serious flaws include:

1. Its cost: The bill will cost American taxpayers trillions of dollars and will lower American workers’ wages over the next 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office;

2. Its impact on entitlements: The bill fails to close the loopholes that allow legal immigrants (and their dependents) as well as illegal immigrants to access the myriad tax credits, welfare programs and other public assistance programs (despite requirements under the Welfare Reform Act of 1996);

3. Its total lack of border security: The Senate bill fails to secure the border and actually exacerbates existing weaknesses in our national security. The Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents are opposed to the bill for that reason.

4. Its impact on state and local budgets: The bill will impose significant burdens on state and local governments that will bear the burden of delivering certain legally required benefits, including in our local schools.

Obamacare should have taught us the dangers of passing sweeping “comprehensive” legislation. Congress should not pass legislation that is written by special interests and opposed by the American public. In addition, Congress should not pass legislation that is too large and complex for anyone to read and comprehend. Finally, Congress should take its legislative responsibilities and Constitutional duties seriously and not hand over significant policy-making decision and discretion to unelected bureaucrats without any real oversight or accountability.

It’s time for us to let Tom Marino of the US House of Representatives know that the Senate bill should be completely discarded.

John Morningstar

Bradford County Tea Party