Mesquite Tea Party member and Nevada State Coordinator for Tea Party Patriots, along with TPP National Coordinators Diana Reimer and Gregg Cummings, will join Las Vegas Tea Party in a flash rally to Reid in front of his office on Wednesday.

The purpose of this rally is "DC Intervention", and to send a message to our Senators that the Amnesty Bill should not be passed without deeper scrutiny. We want to prevent this bill from becoming the same "train wreck" that Obamacare has become, in the words of one of it's architects and supporters, Senator Max Baucus.

If at all possible, organize your local tea party to hold a rally in your city to coincide with this rally. Lets present a united front to the rest of the Country, that Nevada's Tea Parties stand in opposition to amnesty.

If you need any more info, please don't hesitate to contact me by phone or email.

Karen Steelmon
702 238 5134
lasvegasteaparty@gmail.com

Comments: 0

Comments: 0

Comments: 0

Read more: […]

Comments: 0

Comments: 0

Comments: 0

Comments: 0

Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan, End […]

Comments: 0

Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan, End Trickle Down and Start "Trickle Up For U.S. Citizens".

Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan The New Face Of The GOP

The New Republican Party Concentrating On A Balanced Approach Between Businesses Creating Jobs & U.S. Citizens Finding Pathways To Those Jobs Through Skill Enhancement and Information Resources

Mitt Romney Paul Ryan The New Face Of The GOP

Mitt Romney was the Governor of Massachusetts in 2002 in a "Democratic" state. Yes, a republican was elected in Massachusetts because democratic elected officials couldn't make any improvements in the state because "liberalism" just doesn't work. Mitt Romney was a conservative and that's what the state needed so the democratic population either stayed home or voted for Romney. More than likely the democrats just stayed home and let Romney get elected.

The democrats of the state wanted the so called Romney care. The state legislature was controlled by democratic elected officials in a democratic state. Romney was a republican in a democratic liberal state that wanted government run health care. No different than Arnold Schwarzenegger in California. California is a democratic state and things just can't get done because again, "Liberalism by democrats" doesn't work. Now California has a democratic governor and the states failing faster with a democratic governor than with a republican governor. Romney went through the same B.S. in Massachusetts, "the democrats just wouldn't let the proper fixes happen but at least Romney got some positive things done.

It has never been mentioned in the news why Romney signed the government health care in Massachusetts but I bet yah Romney cut a deal with the democrats and got some of his bills passed in exchange for signing "Romney Care". This is the way it is with a democratic controlled congress. A republican governor can't get anything done unless he/she signs into law some god forsaken mess the democrats want.

Other than the Romney Care in Massachusetts I haven't heard anything else that would lead me to beleive that Romney supports any kind of liberal idology. The business man Bloomberg who became mayor of New York city is a super liberal. Bloomberg knows his numbers but watch out, Bloomberg supports liberal social issues that drag the morals of a city down then tries to correct the moral downfall of the city by creating anti fat laws and other "You Act And Do This Way" laws to control thought. Mitt Romney isn't anything like mayor Bloomberg of New York or the old school republican party.

Romney needs to attract the student and womens vote. The spanish vote is meaningless because they are Obama supporters looking for amnesty for their friends and family members they bring into the U.S. illegally. The black vote is lost to Obama automatically. Romney also needs to win the Ron Paul supporters. Ron Paul supporters usually support free and open borders but they hate Obama more so Romney should do well with Ron Paul supporters. Ron Paul supporters are hell bent on voting for Gary Johnson now that Ron Paul is backing off this election. Libertarians are more concerned about themselves over the welfare of the U.S. .

As for issues Mitt Romney supports that's clear with his choice of Paul Ryan as VP. Paul Ryan oversees the governments budget in congress and Mitt Romney picking Paul Ryan as his running mate tells the whole story of Mitt Romneys plan to restore the U.S. as a country that will lead and take care of U.S. citizens first.

Mitt Romney wants to be the face of the new energized republican party and not part of the established GOP that didn't take care of business. The old established GOP didn't cause the 2008 economic mess as the democrats would have people beleive but they didn't push hard enough against a democratic congress that did cause the 2008 economic mess to get the changes installed that would have avoided the collaspe. President Bush did try to pass bills in congress to repair Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac but the democrats rejected these changes and in 2008 millions of people lost their homes and became improverished.

Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan will lead U.S. citizens into a fresh era of republican responsibility to U.S. citizens promoting new pathways to financial freedom for all and a balanced approach between U.S. citizen financial health and businesses creating jobs that support U.S. citizens way of life.

Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan are very concerned about issues concerning single women and graduating college students. Both groups are fighting to create their income sources either as new entries into the work force or single women that can't find the financial path that will support them through an education program and get them educated enough to become a force in the work place that doesn't have to rely on government assistance.

Mitt Romney just announced in a few campaign ads he is running that a federal skills program will be created to help U.S. citizens that are having trouble getting trained or advancing their skills due to rising financial costs in the public and private educational systems. Support of individuals through the educational period with housing, food and misc. costs is a problem that will be addressed so the vast potential labor force of graduting college students and single women can be a great source for employers to utilize.

Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan want to be the new face of the republican party that addresses the needs of U.S. citizens seeking to find that path to financial freedom in the private sector. All U.S. citizens and not just the chosen few from one political party or private sector group. Giving all U.S. citizens male or female an equal footing in the private sector and creating a variety of paths to gain a reasonable income that will support each individual is the new republican goal.

A smaller compact government that is built to be completely efficient in dealing with its financial and private sector issues will free up billions of dollars that can be spent on creating resouces that U.S. citizens can us to find that pathway to financial freedom either through skills training or information resouces. U.S. citizens that want a "True" hand up and not a welfare system hand out will be able to find it here in Mitt Romneys skill program. People looking for a hand out will still be able to find that in the states welfare system.

As for the tax code, that has to be updated without a doubt. Any democratic messages stating that Mitt Romneys tax plan will eliminate popular tax deductions that middle class and low income wage earners use is "Not True". Some loop holes will be closed that high income earners use to increase their profit margins. The basic overall tax codes may be updated so they are more efficient and less confusing but the popular deductions the middle class uses will be kept intact without any new taxes put upon them. The democrats will say because of the tax cuts being given to businesses the republicans will have to impose new taxes on the middle class to make up for those new income tax cuts on businesses but this statement by the democrats is a blunt lie. Tax cuts to businesses means more jobs will be created that will flood the U.S. treasury with billions of dollars more than doing it the democratic way of raising taxes on the wealthy. Tax cuts on businesses will generate 1000 times the revenue than taxing the wealthy due to increased job creation and U.S. citizens gaining income sources though greater access to earning from jobs.

Dealing with the income gap between the top 1% and the bottom 99% is another story that's easy to change though adjusting trade with China, lowering taxes on businesses to bring back jobs to the U.S. and putting restrictions on the immigration that's flooding the U.S. market with cheap labor. Taking care of these three issues will start the turn around decreasing that income gap.

Read more: http://teapartywhitehouse.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=republicancandidates&action=display&thread=265#ixzz26wdzZp1e

Comments: 0

http://teapartywhitehouse.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=democraticcandidates&action=display&thread=343

Comments: 0

Comments: 1

Comments: 1

Comments: 1

Comments: 1

Comments: 1

START QUOTE FROM WIKIPEDIA

White […]

Comments: 0

This list only shows […]

Comments: 0

This list only shows hispanic populations in U.S. cities that have reached 30% and above. There are vertually hundreds of U.S. cities not on the this list that are below 30% but are growing in numbers due to illegal immigration across the U.S. southern border.

1.U.S. Hispanic purchasing power has surged to nearly $870 billion in 2008 and is projected to reach as much as $1.3 trillion by 2015.

2.During the past decade, the rate of growth was more than two times the overall national rate.

3.The rising affluence of the nation’s 44.3 million Hispanics is increasing at a blistering pace. U.S. Hispanic purchasing power has been growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.8 percent since 1980, more than twice as fast as the 2.52 percent rate for total U.S. purchasing power during the same period.

4.The rising rate of purchasing power is even more impressive over the 10-year period from 1996 to 2006, during which U.S. Hispanic purchasing power posted a compound annual growth rate of 6.96 percent, versus just 2.8 percent for total U.S. disposable income.

Rank, City, & Percent of population Hispanic

1. Hialeah, Florida 94.4

2. Laredo, Texas 94.3

3. Brownsville, Texas 92.5

4. McAllen, Texas 81.3

5. El Paso, Texas 80.0

6. Santa Ana, California 79.0

7. Salinas, California 72.0

8. Pomona, California 71.3

9. Downey, California 70.4

10. Oxnard, California 70.1

11. Miami, Florida 69.4

12. El Monte, California 68.6

13. Norwalk, California 68.4

14. Ontario, California 64.3

15. Fontana, California 63.1

16. San Antonio, Texas 61.2

17. Pasadena, Texas 59.2

18. Corpus Christi, Texas 58.1

19. Elizabeth, New Jersey 56.7

20. San Bernardino, California 56.6

21. Chula Vista, California 55.6

22. Paterson, New Jersey 55.1

23. Moreno Valley, California 52.5

24. West Covina, California 52.5

25. Anaheim, California 52.4

26. Palmdale, California 52.4

27. Inglewood, California 49.2

28. Odessa, Texas 49.2

29. Los Angeles, California 48.4

30. Riverside, California 47.8

31. Pueblo, Colorado 45.9

32. Victorville, California 45.7

33. Escondido, California 45.1

34. Fresno, California 44.6

35. Albuquerque, New Mexico 44.0

36. Dallas, Texas 43.1

37. Elgin, Illinois 42.9

38. Bakersfield, California 42.2

39. Phoenix, Arizona 42.1

40. Houston, Texas 41.9

41. Irving, Texas 41.8

42. Hartford, Connecticut 41.4

43. Corona, California 40.9

44. Visalia, California 40.6

45. Long Beach, California 40.2

46. Grand Prairie, Texas 40.2

47. Tucson, Arizona 39.5

48. Garden Grove, California 39.0

49. Providence, Rhode Island 37.6

50. Hayward, California 37.6

51. Orange, California 37.5

52. Garland, Texas 37.3

53. North Las Vegas, Nevada 37.2

54. Pembroke Pines, Florida 37.2

55. Stockton, California 37.0

56. Aurora, Illinois 36.9

57. Miramar, Florida 36.6

58. Lancaster, California 36.5

59. Allentown, Pennsylvania 36.2

60. Glendale, Arizona 36.1

61. Midland, Texas 35.4

62. Austin, Texas 35.0

63. Richmond, California 34.9

64. Springfield, Massachusetts 34.8

65. Modesto, California 34.4

66. Denver, Colorado 34.1

67. Costa Mesa, California 34.0

68. Fort Worth, Texas 33.8

69. Pasadena, California 33.5

70. Oceanside, California 33.5

71. Bridgeport, Connecticut 33.3

72. Fullerton, California 33.0

73. Rancho Cucamonga, California 32.5

74. Newark, New Jersey 31.9

75. San Buenaventura, California 31.7

76. San Jose, California 31.5

77. Lubbock, Texas 30.6

78. Las Vegas, Nevada 30.0

Read more: http://teapartywhitehouse.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=immigration&thread=287&page=1#ixzz21L2RqR8B

Comments: 0

Comments: 0

Comments: 0