This list only shows hispanic populations in U.S. cities that have reached 30% and above. There are vertually hundreds of U.S. cities not on the this list that are below 30% but are growing in numbers due to illegal immigration across the U.S. southern border.

1.U.S. Hispanic purchasing power has surged to nearly $870 billion in 2008 and is projected to reach as much as $1.3 trillion by 2015.

2.During the past decade, the rate of growth was more than two times the overall national rate.

3.The rising affluence of the nation’s 44.3 million Hispanics is increasing at a blistering pace. U.S. Hispanic purchasing power has been growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.8 percent since 1980, more than twice as fast as the 2.52 percent rate for total U.S. purchasing power during the same period.

4.The rising rate of purchasing power is even more impressive over the 10-year period from 1996 to 2006, during which U.S. Hispanic purchasing power posted a compound annual growth rate of 6.96 percent, versus just 2.8 percent for total U.S. disposable income.

Rank, City, & Percent of population Hispanic

1. Hialeah, Florida 94.4

2. Laredo, Texas 94.3

3. Brownsville, Texas 92.5

4. McAllen, Texas 81.3

5. El Paso, Texas 80.0

6. Santa Ana, California 79.0

7. Salinas, California 72.0

8. Pomona, California 71.3

9. Downey, California 70.4

10. Oxnard, California 70.1

11. Miami, Florida 69.4

12. El Monte, California 68.6

13. Norwalk, California 68.4

14. Ontario, California 64.3

15. Fontana, California 63.1

16. San Antonio, Texas 61.2

17. Pasadena, Texas 59.2

18. Corpus Christi, Texas 58.1

19. Elizabeth, New Jersey 56.7

20. San Bernardino, California 56.6

21. Chula Vista, California 55.6

22. Paterson, New Jersey 55.1

23. Moreno Valley, California 52.5

24. West Covina, California 52.5

25. Anaheim, California 52.4

26. Palmdale, California 52.4

27. Inglewood, California 49.2

28. Odessa, Texas 49.2

29. Los Angeles, California 48.4

30. Riverside, California 47.8

31. Pueblo, Colorado 45.9

32. Victorville, California 45.7

33. Escondido, California 45.1

34. Fresno, California 44.6

35. Albuquerque, New Mexico 44.0

36. Dallas, Texas 43.1

37. Elgin, Illinois 42.9

38. Bakersfield, California 42.2

39. Phoenix, Arizona 42.1

40. Houston, Texas 41.9

41. Irving, Texas 41.8

42. Hartford, Connecticut 41.4

43. Corona, California 40.9

44. Visalia, California 40.6

45. Long Beach, California 40.2

46. Grand Prairie, Texas 40.2

47. Tucson, Arizona 39.5

48. Garden Grove, California 39.0

49. Providence, Rhode Island 37.6

50. Hayward, California 37.6

51. Orange, California 37.5

52. Garland, Texas 37.3

53. North Las Vegas, Nevada 37.2

54. Pembroke Pines, Florida 37.2

55. Stockton, California 37.0

56. Aurora, Illinois 36.9

57. Miramar, Florida 36.6

58. Lancaster, California 36.5

59. Allentown, Pennsylvania 36.2

60. Glendale, Arizona 36.1

61. Midland, Texas 35.4

62. Austin, Texas 35.0

63. Richmond, California 34.9

64. Springfield, Massachusetts 34.8

65. Modesto, California 34.4

66. Denver, Colorado 34.1

67. Costa Mesa, California 34.0

68. Fort Worth, Texas 33.8

69. Pasadena, California 33.5

70. Oceanside, California 33.5

71. Bridgeport, Connecticut 33.3

72. Fullerton, California 33.0

73. Rancho Cucamonga, California 32.5

74. Newark, New Jersey 31.9

75. San Buenaventura, California 31.7

76. San Jose, California 31.5

77. Lubbock, Texas 30.6

78. Las Vegas, Nevada 30.0

Read more: http://teapartywhitehouse.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=immigration&thread=287&page=1#ixzz21L2RqR8B

Comments: 0

Comments: 0

http://www.southsoundpatriots.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/6-21-12candidateeventoly.pdf

Comments: 0