These are the principles and covenants that WE, a people desirous of a limited federal government, MUST ADVOCATE: For example, what is our “Plan for reducing the tax burden?” Begin with advocating these first 5 positions:

1. financial responsibility and accountability insuring that all investments made with tax payer funds be examined and decided on the basis of a sound business plan, adequate capital investment of its partners and stock holders, and the expectation of long-term success; and further, that all profits, interest, earnings on property and securities from whatsoever source are proportioned back to the states and the taxpayers;
2. demanding and receiving from all nations to whom we provide security, payment for the expenses incurred by our government and its taxpayers to furnish them with our military personnel, equipment, ordinance, and safe quarters while on their lands; and to further insure the paid medical care of all wounded in action both short term and permanent, coupled with a sustainable monthly allowance to support their families, and paying a delegated amount to the families of all killed in action, or as a result of being stationed on their land;
3. imposing work demands upon all prisoners sentenced to incarceration for more than 90 days, to provide for their detention expenses, daily necessities, and to provide for the welfare of their dependents; actions that will greatly diminish the tax burden on the American people;
4. taxation on the purchase and consumption of goods rather than personal or business incomes, a principle supported by Alexander Hamilton in the 14th Federalist paper;
5. eliminate the Department of Education and restore to the states their proper right to exercise full oversight and controls over the education and curricula of all educational institutions within its jurisdictions;

6. restoration of religious expressions and practice without hindrance;
7. the right to bear arms in every city and state in the union for our self protection without unnecessary restraint and limitation, for the purpose of securing our persons and property from both foreign and domestic terrorism and threats; excepting only the right to disarm those who are, or become, members of known and recognized terrorist groups and gangs;
8. the security as before provided for all generations in the Bill of Rights, and a government transparent to, and accountable to, the people and Congress of the United States.
9. that all laws, regulations, taxes, and restrictions imposed on the citizens must be equally obligatory and enforceable on every member and employee of the federal government and its assigns without exception.

These policy positions are firmly embodied in the duties, obligations, and responsibilities inherent in the laws of fiduciary responsibility and trusteeship which was made incumbent upon the federal government when our forefathers “vested” certain cherished financial trusts, invaluable sovereign and sacred rights, and other “treasures” of great value to the states, they placed under its protections; whose duty it is to protect, defend, and secure these certain and valued rights and trusts committed to them and enumerated in the document we refer to as the Constitution of the United States.

Therefore, I submit to the peace-loving people of this district, and this state that no one entrenched in the foxholes of government domination is going to “give back” the rights they have usurped for their own enrichment. IT BECOMES THEREFORE, ENCUMBENT UPON US, the Common People, TO REPLACE those in the Congress and Senate who have not left their secure foxholes, have not condemned the usurpation of the people’s rights and liberties, have not attempted to restrain the appropriation of additional powers from the states, and have not taken steps to limit the powers of the government, nor have begun to initiate action to restore our sacred rights, even those who have enriched themselves at the expense of the governed.

Of particular mention, we must examine the record of those who profess themselves to be conservative Republicans, and determine if they have STOOD THEIR GROUND in DEFIANCE of these illegal and unconstitutional acts, or caved in to the demands of this administration to further encroach upon and usurp our rights; and if it be determined they have not stood their ground in defense of the sacred trust committed to their keeping, THEY MUST, of NECESSITY, ALSO BE RESPLACED.

I am advocating for the election of individuals committed to supporting and defending the principles and the sacred confidence originally vested by our forefathers in the federal government: individuals who will engage in a strong, determined, yet peaceable means of restoring our government to its proper place of strength in matters foreign and domestic.

Of grave importance, they must immediately begin to create a stable environment aimed at alleviating the fears of the electorate who have begun to question the government’s loyalty to uphold the sacred fiduciary trust delegated to it by the people.

It is reported that our government is preparing the military and police for a national revolt. If this is true, I submit that the fear and apprehension within the hearts of Americans losing hope of a bright and successful future for themselves and their children is well documented by the administration. Otherwise, why the preparation? But should a government wary of revolt prepare to kill its own citizens instead of making the changes necessary to promote the peace and general welfare of its citizens? Is our government going to mimic the insufferable tragedies upon us that King Assad of Syria, is waging against his own people -choosing to kill his own people rather than give way to progressive change? Is this the future we envision for ourselves and our loved ones?

Revolution may be at our doorsteps, but do we welcome it? Do we support an uprising that will devastate our nation and bring death and misery to its citizens; or do we make every attempt to deter violence and put the people at rest? We must breathe the fresh air of a legitimate hope and change policy in an attempt to restore the hope that our government will be restored. That our policies will bring about economic recovery and stability, a definite increase in employment opportunities, lower taxes, and establishing the bond of unity between a people that have been so divided against each other. This is the only way that I know of to avoid the much anticipated bloodshed.

Once again, the weight and burden is upon us, the people, to vote the opportunists out of office and to vote those among us into office who share our core values and virtues, and who desire the blessings of God upon our nation and our children to the third and fourth generations of those who believe in Him.

I have presented a peaceable plan of action that will not advance the violence the government is anticipating. As Congressman Paul Ryan was known to say many times, “WE CAN DO THIS!”

A major portion of this text was taken from a speech I gave before a Republican assembly when I ran for Congress in 1986. It was a message out of time, and will undoubtedly have a far greater influence if I were to give it today. Nevertheless, it is a positive message, and while we may make certain statements to point out the actions of those in government, we must refrain from using names and deliberate personal attacks. This is what we all desire, “Tell me what YOU are going to do to make a difference – We already know what the other isn’t doing, or DID!”

I would be more than honored to see the essence of this message being proclaimed by every candidate running for office in 2014, because I believe this message is timely, impossible to contradict or successfully dispute, and I am convinced if it is included in the platform of the New Revitalized Republican Party, the true Party of the People, it will result in many victories for Conservative Christians, Friends of Israel, and people of virtue of all faiths. If called upon, I would be honored to present this message personally before the citizens of your communities. But, it is far more important, of grave importance, to get this message into the hands of those who would be faithful candidates and elected officials for federal office in 2014. If you believe this is the message for today, then spread the word as quickly and with as much energy as you possess.

Let this be our charge, the conviction of our hearts, “We must have the majority in the Senate and in the House!”

Thank you and God bless all your efforts and successes.

Rev. Anthony Mucciolo
tonymorro@gmail.com

Comments: 0

Comments: 0

Comments: 0

Comments: 0

Comments: 0

Comments: 0

Comments: 0

Comments: 0

Comments: 0

Comments: 0

Comments: 0

Comments: 0

Comments: 0

Comments: 0

Obamacare will hurt the economy more than it will help. Even though healthcare should be available to all U.S. citizens a balanced program has to be created to care for people that can't pay and getting health care providers compensated for their efforts to heal the uninsured. Obamacare won't do this because Obamacare does not address the reasons for high medical care costs and will force the low wage workers to payout whatever expendable income they receive through their work or tax refunds into paying for extremely high medical insurance though the government. From my own vision of Obamacare I myself am under the impression the democrats are after the "Tax Refunds" of low wage workers. Low wage workers get all their tax money paid out through the year back and they use this returned tax money to pay off bills, buy a little something extra for themselves which helps stimulate the economy.

The tax Refund stimulus money is given out based on the knowlege that low wage workers spend their tax Refunds and the spending of the tax Refunds stimulates the economy. But the spending of the tax Refunds isn't the only reason the economy is stimulated so the democrats handing out stimulus packages constantly won't work. The fact of the matter is when Obamacare is enacted it will take away that small tax Refund stimulus to the economy every year which boosts business sales and manufacturing. The working poor won't have that little extra income each year and they will have less to look forward to each year. Remember, busineses do not have to provide health care coverage. The busineses that do provide it is at the employees partial or full expense to attract quality workers. If Obamacare "Forces" businesses to provide health care insurance for their employees we can say "GOODBYE" to small business in the U.S. and hello to more super Wal Marts corporate box chain stores. Manufacturing will keep moving to foreign countries which of coarse Obama and the democrats want to get the U.S. to "COMMUNISM". In my own opinion the democratic communists are not going to raise taxes, "THE DEMOCRATIC COMMUNISTS WILL STOP THE TAX REFUNDS", Period! to the 50% of the U.S. population that get the tax Refunds every year to fund the massive government spending plans. After Obamacare is in full play the internal revenue service will start up with the penalties for non compliance with the "You Must Have Insurance" law and the non payouts of a persons tax Refunds will begin. Remember, the penalty for non compliance is the withholding of tax money owed by the government to the tax payer. Soon after that the democrats will "Make Up" some law for some reason to end tax returns and use the communist dictator commander in chief waivers to let the non working poor off the hook so to speak and that will strenghten the government health care system and destroy most of the insurance industry. The partial destruction of the insurance industry will create outragious insurance premiums for the people that can afford insurance. The people that can afford insurance won't be able to afford it anymore and will be pushed into Obamacare. The dominos will fall into place.

Obama himself in his 2008 presidential campaign stated that defects in the medical information system was causing the extremely high healthcare costs but we all know now that this is "B.S." just to keep U.S. citizens away from the real cause of high healthcare costs which is in fact, "Illegal Immigrants" flooding the emergency rooms. Of coarse the democrats and Obama don't want U.S. citizens to know that illegal immigrants are driving up healthcare costs because the democrats, Bill Clinton and Barack Obama are using the illegal and legal immigrants to build a large enough voting block to destroy the republicans and turn the U.S. to "COMMUNISM". Obama has already started using the presidential waivers to pick and choose who gets what and when like a frick'in communist dictator commander in chief. The big kicker is that illegal aliens will still be able to use the emergency room for their health care keeping the outragious medical costs up just so the democrats can grow their voting block (Most immigrants vote democratic when they become citizens). Who will keep paying for the medical care of illegal immigrants? Of coarse, the taxpayer will pay for 50 million illegal immigrants and whomever can sneak across the border. Obamacare doesn't cover illegal immigrants but illegal immigrants can still use the emergency rooms. Who would need Obamacare if the illegal immigrants were gone and healthcare costs were affordable again? Who would need Obamacare if the hospital and corporate medical establishments were forced to quit piling on profit to feed all the stock holders who are in fact the hospital corporate executives?

Read more: http://teapartywhitehouse.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=medicalneeds&action=display&thread=368#ixzz27z34gqXL

Obamacare goes into full affect in 2014. In 2014 the tax penalties can be enforced. Businesses have already started dropping their employee health care insurance. The tax penalties for not having health care insurance will rake in billions of dollars in peoples yearly tax returns to pay the penalties. After that happens insurance rates will go through the roof pushing even more people into dropping their insurance and just letting the government take the tax returns. The insurance industry will be trashed. Congress won't have anything to say about the taking of the tax returns as more and more people are forced into Obamacare because private health care insurance is to expensive.

Obamacare is the engineered takeover of the whole U.S. economy. It's designed to force taxes on the working poor and middle class by taking away the "Tax Refund".

Comments: 0

Comments: 1

Comments: 0

Comments: 0

This list only shows hispanic populations in U.S. cities that have reached 30% and above. There are vertually hundreds of U.S. cities not on the this list that are below 30% but are growing in numbers due to illegal immigration across the U.S. southern border.

1.U.S. Hispanic purchasing power has surged to nearly $870 billion in 2008 and is projected to reach as much as $1.3 trillion by 2015.

2.During the past decade, the rate of growth was more than two times the overall national rate.

3.The rising affluence of the nation’s 44.3 million Hispanics is increasing at a blistering pace. U.S. Hispanic purchasing power has been growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.8 percent since 1980, more than twice as fast as the 2.52 percent rate for total U.S. purchasing power during the same period.

4.The rising rate of purchasing power is even more impressive over the 10-year period from 1996 to 2006, during which U.S. Hispanic purchasing power posted a compound annual growth rate of 6.96 percent, versus just 2.8 percent for total U.S. disposable income.

Rank, City, & Percent of population Hispanic

1. Hialeah, Florida 94.4

2. Laredo, Texas 94.3

3. Brownsville, Texas 92.5

4. McAllen, Texas 81.3

5. El Paso, Texas 80.0

6. Santa Ana, California 79.0

7. Salinas, California 72.0

8. Pomona, California 71.3

9. Downey, California 70.4

10. Oxnard, California 70.1

11. Miami, Florida 69.4

12. El Monte, California 68.6

13. Norwalk, California 68.4

14. Ontario, California 64.3

15. Fontana, California 63.1

16. San Antonio, Texas 61.2

17. Pasadena, Texas 59.2

18. Corpus Christi, Texas 58.1

19. Elizabeth, New Jersey 56.7

20. San Bernardino, California 56.6

21. Chula Vista, California 55.6

22. Paterson, New Jersey 55.1

23. Moreno Valley, California 52.5

24. West Covina, California 52.5

25. Anaheim, California 52.4

26. Palmdale, California 52.4

27. Inglewood, California 49.2

28. Odessa, Texas 49.2

29. Los Angeles, California 48.4

30. Riverside, California 47.8

31. Pueblo, Colorado 45.9

32. Victorville, California 45.7

33. Escondido, California 45.1

34. Fresno, California 44.6

35. Albuquerque, New Mexico 44.0

36. Dallas, Texas 43.1

37. Elgin, Illinois 42.9

38. Bakersfield, California 42.2

39. Phoenix, Arizona 42.1

40. Houston, Texas 41.9

41. Irving, Texas 41.8

42. Hartford, Connecticut 41.4

43. Corona, California 40.9

44. Visalia, California 40.6

45. Long Beach, California 40.2

46. Grand Prairie, Texas 40.2

47. Tucson, Arizona 39.5

48. Garden Grove, California 39.0

49. Providence, Rhode Island 37.6

50. Hayward, California 37.6

51. Orange, California 37.5

52. Garland, Texas 37.3

53. North Las Vegas, Nevada 37.2

54. Pembroke Pines, Florida 37.2

55. Stockton, California 37.0

56. Aurora, Illinois 36.9

57. Miramar, Florida 36.6

58. Lancaster, California 36.5

59. Allentown, Pennsylvania 36.2

60. Glendale, Arizona 36.1

61. Midland, Texas 35.4

62. Austin, Texas 35.0

63. Richmond, California 34.9

64. Springfield, Massachusetts 34.8

65. Modesto, California 34.4

66. Denver, Colorado 34.1

67. Costa Mesa, California 34.0

68. Fort Worth, Texas 33.8

69. Pasadena, California 33.5

70. Oceanside, California 33.5

71. Bridgeport, Connecticut 33.3

72. Fullerton, California 33.0

73. Rancho Cucamonga, California 32.5

74. Newark, New Jersey 31.9

75. San Buenaventura, California 31.7

76. San Jose, California 31.5

77. Lubbock, Texas 30.6

78. Las Vegas, Nevada 30.0

Read more: http://teapartywhitehouse.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=immigration&thread=287&page=1#ixzz21L2RqR8B

Comments: 0

Comments: 0